Skip to main content

The UK risks alienating the world’s best talent

 Keir Starmer’s new immigration plan is an obvious and clumsy attempt to court Reform voters. What is worse is that it won’t make anyone happy: the Labour party has a traditionally immigrant-friendly stance and won’t be happy, Reform voters will see through this pathetic attempt to bring immigration numbers down, and highly skilled immigrants won’t be happy because they are being targeted unfairly.


The UK, and especially London, attracts millions of talented workers from all over the world. Some come to stay, and some leave after a while. They work in tech, finance, and pretty much all the sectors that make London the economic engine of the country. Let’s be clear about something from the start: the UK does NOT have enough homegrown talent to fill all the high-skilled vacancies in UK companies. These highly productive workers are a scarce and valuable resource, and unless we find a planet with (very) intelligent life tomorrow, we have to live with the fact that high-skilled workers are rare. And they are very well paid.


It is something of a miracle that in this economy and with this government high-skilled people still want to move to the UK. Maybe they haven’t heard of how bad things are over here, but who cares – they are coming and they are welcome. Yes, they are welcome, because it is people on the highest salaries that pay for the NHS, pensions, and pretty much anything you can think of. Many high-skilled workers make a multiple of the average UK salary, and attracting and retaining these individuals is essential for economic growth.


If UK companies become unable to attract this talent into the UK and hire them, they will simply hire these people somewhere else. What’s worse is that a company might simply not set up a base in the UK if the UK lacks both the human capital and the qualities to attract it. Similarly, people wanting to found a startup might think twice about setting up their company in the UK if hiring talent becomes harder (that is, even if Labour’s jobs tax hasn’t already deterred them).


Labour’s proposal does exactly this: it makes the UK less attractive for top talent compared to other countries. When people move countries, chances are that they think deeply about the consequences of their choice: salaries, quality of life, taxation, and access to permanent residence (ILR) and citizenship are all factors that determine how likely a person is to move to a certain country. Starmer’s proposal to double the time it takes to get ILR from 5 years to 10 years makes the UK a lot less attractive than other developed/comparable countries. Not to mention that these countries already have other advantages over the UK, like the US offering higher salaries and lower taxes.


On top of potentially losing out on top talent with top salaries, there is another economic disadvantage of making people gain ILR after 10 years instead of 5: once you get ILR you can do ‘whatever’ you want, like start your own company for example. Setting up a small business of your own isn’t feasible for people on a Skilled Worker visa, and forcing people to wait 10 years for ILR means people won’t be able to set up their own business as quickly. Again, less economic growth.


As if all of this wasn’t enough to deem the proposed reform completely misguided, here’s another thing: the increase to 10 years will apply to immigrants who are already living in the UK and who might be close to getting ILR. This is, frankly, immoral. People who have come to the UK under a certain set of rules should not have the rug pulled from under their feet, especially if they are well paid and paying much more tax than the average Brit. It is now faster for many of them to relocate to the US and get a green card over there – the Labour party has already taxed non-doms out of existence, but they don’t seem to have learnt anything from the exodus of millionaires creating a black hole in the state’s finances.


And so it happens that highly productive individuals are becoming a pawn in Labour’s political games. Meanwhile nobody has stopped the boats coming from France or knows how to do that, a phone is stolen every what, 2? 3 minutes?, crime keeps rising and criminals cannot be deported – in case Labour were wondering, THOSE are the issues driving the anti-immigration sentiment. Targeting high-skilled workers to drive overall immigration numbers down will only mean less revenue for the state, but it will have no impact on the immigration-related problems people are facing. A much better option would be to increase the salary threshold for people coming to the UK (something the Conservatives already did, and which is already driving the number of visas down) and find a way to deal with criminals.

Popular posts from this blog

Is CANZUK the UK's natural home?

We've all heard about CANZUK. Or have we? There has been some recent interest in the concept of CANZUK - an alliance between Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK. The reason for this recent uptick in interest (which can interestingly be verified on Google Trends) is, considering the unprovoked trade war started by the US against Canada, not accidental. The world order is changing, and so the Anglosphere needs to adapt, too. The US has not only become an unreliable partner -- Americans have shown the world that they are willing to put in charge a dangerous man freelancing as a clown, twice. It is clear that the pax americana is coming to an end, and western democracies need to realign and decouple from America - fast. This isn't to say that America has become an enemy, not at all. It is still a strong Western ally, but its support for NATO, freedom, democracy and the West in general cannot be taken for granted anymore. And so the countries that still care about western valu...

The root cause of all American evils

TL;DR:  it's the two-party system. Longer version: it's the two-party system. Yes, really. Full version: When Americans go to the supermarket, for every product they want to buy they are overwhelmed by choice. Cereals, tomato sauce, apples -- everything is available in all shapes and flavours, with multiple brands competing with each other and products coming from all over the world. I am writing this before the tariff-induced famine. When Americans go to the polls, it looks a little bit different. There are, realistically for most of the country, only two options. This is a problem because when choice is limited, quality isn't incentivised. Going back to the supermarket example, imagine that there are only two brands of cereals you can buy: well, that isn't really a lot of options, and you might very well end up buying the cereals that you "dislike the least" rather than the ones you "like the most". As if that was not bad enough, the only two brand...

Italy’s love for the big state is a cultural remnant of fascism

 Today we are going to make Italians mad. And no, we will not be breaking spaghetti – something that my Italian family has been doing for generations, no, centuries, before TikTok videos started circulating claiming that Italians don’t break spaghetti. We do, in fact, break our spaghetti, just like any sane person with a functioning brain would do when the spaghetti clearly doesn't fit into the pot. I actually used to sometimes not break my spaghetti, but now I always do so out of spite: it gives me both physical and emotional pleasure to know that the Italian gods are frowning upon my heartless breaking of spaghetti. As much as I would love to talk about how only people living in a hopeless country could get brutally angry about other people’s freedom to break spaghetti, and how this relates to Italy still being a fundamentally fascist-loving country at heart, the topic I suggest for today is the following: the link between Italians loving the big state and Italy having experienc...