Skip to main content

If Trump wants Ukraine's minerals, he should offer security

Yesterday's meeting with Zelensky at the White House was hard to watch. It was tense, not just because the situation is extremely delicate, but because people were shouting in a rare display of complete lack of control.

For a man who preaches diplomacy, JD Vance showed he has none. When asked how you can deal diplomatically with a dictator like Putin, who has violated diplomatic agreements in the past, and who has, you know, invaded Ukraine, Vance started raising his voice and shifted the conversation from facts to ad personam attacks, asking Zelensky why he hasn't "said 'thank you' once" since coming into the meeting, and blaming him for asking a completely legitimate question the vice president simply didn't have an answer to.

We all understand the war must end, as it cannot go on forever. We also understand that Ukraine cannot win against Russia without support from the West. What we need to figure out is a solution where, even if we let Russia keep the territories it is occupying (something that isn't ideal, but might end up being inevitable, especially with this US administration), a deal is signed that provides the security Ukraine needs to prosper without the fear that Putin will eventually come for another piece of its country.

And the only way you do that, dear Mr Vance and Mr Trump, is by providing real security. A piece of paper that says the fighting can stop will do nothing to deter Putin from coming back.

There's more. Ukraine now has one card to play. Trump said yesterday that "without us, you don't have any cards". But he's wrong. Ukraine has one card only and Zelensky knows its worth: the US wants Ukraine's minerals, and Trump has shown us just how desperate he is for them. He's repeatedly complained about how the US has "gas and oil" but no rare earths, and he needs them if the US is to keep up in its race against China (a side note: if you're going into a meeting with someone who has what you want, you shouldn't look like a desperate buyer, or the price will increase; you'd think this was obvious to a guy who wrote a book about the "art of the deal", but once again we are reminded of how Trump isn't just an incapable politician, he's also an incapable businessman).
And so Ukraine must push as much as it can for security guarantees by the US. The UK and France are ready to put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine in case of future attacks, but the US too must commit to its security. Unless the US commits to it, I'm afraid another invasion of Ukraine might be inevitable: Putin will take some years to rebuild its army and prepare to come back for more. If Trump wants to "dig dig dig" he should be ready to "fight fight fight".

Popular posts from this blog

Is CANZUK the UK's natural home?

We've all heard about CANZUK. Or have we? There has been some recent interest in the concept of CANZUK - an alliance between Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK. The reason for this recent uptick in interest (which can interestingly be verified on Google Trends) is, considering the unprovoked trade war started by the US against Canada, not accidental. The world order is changing, and so the Anglosphere needs to adapt, too. The US has not only become an unreliable partner -- Americans have shown the world that they are willing to put in charge a dangerous man freelancing as a clown, twice. It is clear that the pax americana is coming to an end, and western democracies need to realign and decouple from America - fast. This isn't to say that America has become an enemy, not at all. It is still a strong Western ally, but its support for NATO, freedom, democracy and the West in general cannot be taken for granted anymore. And so the countries that still care about western valu...

Trump is a broken clock, but he’s right about Europe

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, and I believe this is the case with the current US president. He is a broken clock – but he does have a point regarding Europe. Donald Trump is wrong about most things. In fact, he is wrong about so many things that listing them all would take ages. For simplicity (and to save everyone time) it is much easier to say what he is not wrong about, and I believe on European military spending he is right. Let’s go back in time together. It is 1949 and the West has formed a military alliance called NATO, which aims to provide security to all of its member states. Translated to simple terms: it is a military alliance that protects the West from the Soviet Union. The West, of course, boasts a long list of values to defend: freedom, democracy, the rule of law, and so on. NATO is a military alliance by necessity of the fact that in this world you can only defend yourself by being strong (ideally the strongest), but at heart it is also an organisation that...