Skip to main content

If Trump wants Ukraine's minerals, he should offer security

Yesterday's meeting with Zelensky at the White House was hard to watch. It was tense, not just because the situation is extremely delicate, but because people were shouting in a rare display of complete lack of control.

For a man who preaches diplomacy, JD Vance showed he has none. When asked how you can deal diplomatically with a dictator like Putin, who has violated diplomatic agreements in the past, and who has, you know, invaded Ukraine, Vance started raising his voice and shifted the conversation from facts to ad personam attacks, asking Zelensky why he hasn't "said 'thank you' once" since coming into the meeting, and blaming him for asking a completely legitimate question the vice president simply didn't have an answer to.

We all understand the war must end, as it cannot go on forever. We also understand that Ukraine cannot win against Russia without support from the West. What we need to figure out is a solution where, even if we let Russia keep the territories it is occupying (something that isn't ideal, but might end up being inevitable, especially with this US administration), a deal is signed that provides the security Ukraine needs to prosper without the fear that Putin will eventually come for another piece of its country.

And the only way you do that, dear Mr Vance and Mr Trump, is by providing real security. A piece of paper that says the fighting can stop will do nothing to deter Putin from coming back.

There's more. Ukraine now has one card to play. Trump said yesterday that "without us, you don't have any cards". But he's wrong. Ukraine has one card only and Zelensky knows its worth: the US wants Ukraine's minerals, and Trump has shown us just how desperate he is for them. He's repeatedly complained about how the US has "gas and oil" but no rare earths, and he needs them if the US is to keep up in its race against China (a side note: if you're going into a meeting with someone who has what you want, you shouldn't look like a desperate buyer, or the price will increase; you'd think this was obvious to a guy who wrote a book about the "art of the deal", but once again we are reminded of how Trump isn't just an incapable politician, he's also an incapable businessman).
And so Ukraine must push as much as it can for security guarantees by the US. The UK and France are ready to put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine in case of future attacks, but the US too must commit to its security. Unless the US commits to it, I'm afraid another invasion of Ukraine might be inevitable: Putin will take some years to rebuild its army and prepare to come back for more. If Trump wants to "dig dig dig" he should be ready to "fight fight fight".

Popular posts from this blog

Is CANZUK the UK's natural home?

We've all heard about CANZUK. Or have we? There has been some recent interest in the concept of CANZUK - an alliance between Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK. The reason for this recent uptick in interest (which can interestingly be verified on Google Trends) is, considering the unprovoked trade war started by the US against Canada, not accidental. The world order is changing, and so the Anglosphere needs to adapt, too. The US has not only become an unreliable partner -- Americans have shown the world that they are willing to put in charge a dangerous man freelancing as a clown, twice. It is clear that the pax americana is coming to an end, and western democracies need to realign and decouple from America - fast. This isn't to say that America has become an enemy, not at all. It is still a strong Western ally, but its support for NATO, freedom, democracy and the West in general cannot be taken for granted anymore. And so the countries that still care about western valu...

Italy’s love for the big state is a cultural remnant of fascism

 Today we are going to make Italians mad. And no, we will not be breaking spaghetti – something that my Italian family has been doing for generations, no, centuries, before TikTok videos started circulating claiming that Italians don’t break spaghetti. We do, in fact, break our spaghetti, just like any sane person with a functioning brain would do when the spaghetti clearly doesn't fit into the pot. I actually used to sometimes not break my spaghetti, but now I always do so out of spite: it gives me both physical and emotional pleasure to know that the Italian gods are frowning upon my heartless breaking of spaghetti. As much as I would love to talk about how only people living in a hopeless country could get brutally angry about other people’s freedom to break spaghetti, and how this relates to Italy still being a fundamentally fascist-loving country at heart, the topic I suggest for today is the following: the link between Italians loving the big state and Italy having experienc...

If you want to see AfD fail in Germany, you should want it to be part of government

Let’s start by saying what this post isn’t: this isn’t an article in support of AfD. It also isn’t an article against AfD per se. This is a post about what I think is the reality of the political landscape in Germany, how AfD fits into it, and why its detractors might want to see it in a coalition government sooner rather than later. Ever since AfD was born it has drawn criticism from all sides of Germany’s political spectrum. Everyone has been quick to criticise it every step of the way (a way that has been punctuated by many mistakes, if we’re honest), and German conservatives (CDU and CSU alike) have stayed well clear of forming alliances with AfD in order to keep their reputations intact. There is something about AfD that to many Germans sounds a lot like an echo from a past they have been working hard to apologise for: AfD’s rhetoric around immigrants, as well as some of its members’ comments on whether all Nazis were criminals , have mostly been met with fear and a substantial do...