Skip to main content

If you want to see AfD fail in Germany, you should want it to be part of government

Let’s start by saying what this post isn’t: this isn’t an article in support of AfD. It also isn’t an article against AfD per se. This is a post about what I think is the reality of the political landscape in Germany, how AfD fits into it, and why its detractors might want to see it in a coalition government sooner rather than later.

Ever since AfD was born it has drawn criticism from all sides of Germany’s political spectrum. Everyone has been quick to criticise it every step of the way (a way that has been punctuated by many mistakes, if we’re honest), and German conservatives (CDU and CSU alike) have stayed well clear of forming alliances with AfD in order to keep their reputations intact. There is something about AfD that to many Germans sounds a lot like an echo from a past they have been working hard to apologise for: AfD’s rhetoric around immigrants, as well as some of its members’ comments on whether all Nazis were criminals, have mostly been met with fear and a substantial dose of scepticism.

But there are two problems.

The first is that while Germany’s conservatives have been trying to “stay away” from AfD, at least on the plane of formal alliances, their policies have inevitably shifted towards a more right-wing stance, especially in the space of immigration where AfD is perceived as having an advantage. This has caused two things: first, AfD’s position on immigration has been legitimised (I am not saying this is a good or a bad thing, you can make up your own mind about that, I am just stating a fact); the second is that this shift defies the point of refusing to form an alliance with AfD in the first place, because in the end many voters end up voting for the “original” rather than the “copy” — i.e. they would rather go for AfD than CDU.

The second problem is that this strategy hasn’t worked well for Germany’s conservatives, and trying to shut AfD out of power at all levels of government hasn’t worked either. A coalition with AfD is seen as the ultimate evil, and even using AfD’s votes in parliament to pass legislation seems to be unacceptable, to the point that Angela Merkel had to step out of her peaceful retirement to criticise her own party.

I think we’ve reached an absurd state of things.

First of all, AfD is, whether we like it or not, the democratic expression of many people’s voting intentions. It doesn’t matter who these people are, whether we think we’re smarter than them, or whether they are shooting themselves in the food by supporting AfD: AfD is here, and I believe it is here to stay for a while. What is even more important is that, by keeping AfD out of everything, we essentially make AfD blameless: AfD can’t be blamed for any problems at the federal level if they are never involved in government and if their support in parliament is seen as ‘dirty’.

Take a look at Italy. Giorgia Meloni grew her party from scratch to being the biggest party in Italy. How did she do it? She stayed as far as possible from power for long enough to gain enough votes from people who were fed up with mainstream parties. During covid she famously stayed out of the “governo Draghi”, a government that saw pretty much every party in politics coalesce into one big, happy government which as usual didn’t last very long. Meloni was the only party in opposition, and she was gaining more voters by the day, simply in virtue of the fact that she was not doing anything. Her party wasn’t in government, and as such it could not be blamed for anything. (It doesn’t matter that Meloni herself had in fact been a minister in a Berlusconi government many years before, because voters typically don’t remember more than 5 months of history anyway). Once her party had become the strongest it was easy to win the election and form a coalition government with Meloni as its prime minister.

So I believe this could now be AfD’s destiny: if they are kept out of government for long enough for them to gain the votes of people who are unhappy with traditional parties, the day will come when AfD will be the biggest one. It would be much better for everyone if mainstream parties stopped ostracising AfD and let it be part of a coalition government: I believe the fastest way to lose support is to be criticised for doing something. Keeping AfD out of government exonerates them from taking any responsibility and gives them space to keep growing.

Popular posts from this blog

Is CANZUK the UK's natural home?

We've all heard about CANZUK. Or have we? There has been some recent interest in the concept of CANZUK - an alliance between Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK. The reason for this recent uptick in interest (which can interestingly be verified on Google Trends) is, considering the unprovoked trade war started by the US against Canada, not accidental. The world order is changing, and so the Anglosphere needs to adapt, too. The US has not only become an unreliable partner -- Americans have shown the world that they are willing to put in charge a dangerous man freelancing as a clown, twice. It is clear that the pax americana is coming to an end, and western democracies need to realign and decouple from America - fast. This isn't to say that America has become an enemy, not at all. It is still a strong Western ally, but its support for NATO, freedom, democracy and the West in general cannot be taken for granted anymore. And so the countries that still care about western valu...

If Trump wants Ukraine's minerals, he should offer security

Yesterday's meeting with Zelensky at the White House was hard to watch. It was tense, not just because the situation is extremely delicate, but because people were shouting in a rare display of complete lack of control. For a man who preaches diplomacy, JD Vance showed he has none. When asked how you can deal diplomatically with a dictator like Putin, who has violated diplomatic agreements in the past, and who has, you know, invaded Ukraine , Vance started raising his voice and shifted the conversation from facts to ad personam attacks, asking Zelensky why he hasn't "said 'thank you' once" since coming into the meeting, and blaming him for asking a completely legitimate question the vice president simply didn't have an answer to. We all understand the war must end, as it cannot go on forever. We also understand that Ukraine cannot win against Russia without support from the West. What we need to figure out is a solution where, even if we let Russia keep th...

Trump is a broken clock, but he’s right about Europe

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, and I believe this is the case with the current US president. He is a broken clock – but he does have a point regarding Europe. Donald Trump is wrong about most things. In fact, he is wrong about so many things that listing them all would take ages. For simplicity (and to save everyone time) it is much easier to say what he is not wrong about, and I believe on European military spending he is right. Let’s go back in time together. It is 1949 and the West has formed a military alliance called NATO, which aims to provide security to all of its member states. Translated to simple terms: it is a military alliance that protects the West from the Soviet Union. The West, of course, boasts a long list of values to defend: freedom, democracy, the rule of law, and so on. NATO is a military alliance by necessity of the fact that in this world you can only defend yourself by being strong (ideally the strongest), but at heart it is also an organisation that...