Skip to main content

There's only one way to reform the ISA regime

Rachel Reeves is out there looking for growth. And rumours have it that she's been looking at either abolishing the cash ISA, or reducing it in size.
For those who are not familiar with ISAs, they are accounts for UK resident where you can save up to £20,000 a year, and not pay any tax on the interests - ever. There are multiple types of ISA, but mostly it boils down to: cash ISAs, and stocks and shares ISAs.
A cash ISA is essentially like a deposit account that is tax free. Every year you can add £20k to it, and never pay tax on it. Stocks and shares ISAs allow you to invest your money in the stock market and not pay tax on capital gains. Pretty neat, especially considering the tax burden in the UK is at the highest level in decades.

Now, back to Rachel Reeves and her mission to grow the UK economy. Many investment firms have complained to Reeves that too many people stash their money in cash ISAs, depriving the markets of some £290 billion of potential investment (data from FY22/23). Investment firms have, of course, only the best interest for British people at heart, and couldn't possibly be pushing for more money to be invested because that's literally how they make money.

There are two problems. The first one I would say is moral. Many people saving into a cash ISA are really just trying to protect the little money they have from inflation and taxation. Take a look at cash ISA interest rates over the past decade: you're lucky if you beat inflation most years. The idea that the government should come and take another bit of your money with tax is frankly absurd.

The second problem is that Rachel Reeves is looking for growth, but forcing people out of cash ISAs by either abolishing them or reducing their size won't necessarily spur growth in the UK. For starters, people may not want to invest, and will just keep their money in a taxed savings account. Sure, some people will be prompted to start investing - but will they invest in the London Stock Exchange? Probably not. And why would they? Investing in the LSE is being deterred by the stamp duty tax (SDT). The UK has one of the highest taxes of such kind at 0.5%, whereas many countries (like the US) have none.
So abolishing the cash ISA would probably benefit the US economy more than the UK's, since people would be more likely to invest their money there rather than here.

There is plenty of evidence on the overall damage of the SDT to the LSE, and if we are serious about protecting it, SDT must be abolished. It wouldn't just attract more investments from people forced to leave the cash ISA, but from everyone - including the pension funds Reeves is so keen on pushing to invest in the UK. Plus it could make the LSE more attractive for companies looking to IPO. All this would come at very little costs for the government, because SDT doesn't even raise much money anymore. Ever since it was introduced, pension funds as well as individuals have moved their investments away from the UK, meaning not only that LSE-listed companies have been deprived of cash, but the state isn't raising much money with this tax either.

The nanny state should stop telling individuals what to do with their money and pushing pension funds to invest in the overtaxed UK market: if Rachel Reeves is serious about growth, she must do what is right, rather than what is popular, and abolish stamp duty on shares.
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Is CANZUK the UK's natural home?

We've all heard about CANZUK. Or have we? There has been some recent interest in the concept of CANZUK - an alliance between Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK. The reason for this recent uptick in interest (which can interestingly be verified on Google Trends) is, considering the unprovoked trade war started by the US against Canada, not accidental. The world order is changing, and so the Anglosphere needs to adapt, too. The US has not only become an unreliable partner -- Americans have shown the world that they are willing to put in charge a dangerous man freelancing as a clown, twice. It is clear that the pax americana is coming to an end, and western democracies need to realign and decouple from America - fast. This isn't to say that America has become an enemy, not at all. It is still a strong Western ally, but its support for NATO, freedom, democracy and the West in general cannot be taken for granted anymore. And so the countries that still care about western valu...
Read more

Italy’s love for the big state is a cultural remnant of fascism

 Today we are going to make Italians mad. And no, we will not be breaking spaghetti – something that my Italian family has been doing for generations, no, centuries, before TikTok videos started circulating claiming that Italians don’t break spaghetti. We do, in fact, break our spaghetti, just like any sane person with a functioning brain would do when the spaghetti clearly doesn't fit into the pot. I actually used to sometimes not break my spaghetti, but now I always do so out of spite: it gives me both physical and emotional pleasure to know that the Italian gods are frowning upon my heartless breaking of spaghetti. As much as I would love to talk about how only people living in a hopeless country could get brutally angry about other people’s freedom to break spaghetti, and how this relates to Italy still being a fundamentally fascist-loving country at heart, the topic I suggest for today is the following: the link between Italians loving the big state and Italy having experienc...
Read more

If you want to see AfD fail in Germany, you should want it to be part of government

Let’s start by saying what this post isn’t: this isn’t an article in support of AfD. It also isn’t an article against AfD per se. This is a post about what I think is the reality of the political landscape in Germany, how AfD fits into it, and why its detractors might want to see it in a coalition government sooner rather than later. Ever since AfD was born it has drawn criticism from all sides of Germany’s political spectrum. Everyone has been quick to criticise it every step of the way (a way that has been punctuated by many mistakes, if we’re honest), and German conservatives (CDU and CSU alike) have stayed well clear of forming alliances with AfD in order to keep their reputations intact. There is something about AfD that to many Germans sounds a lot like an echo from a past they have been working hard to apologise for: AfD’s rhetoric around immigrants, as well as some of its members’ comments on whether all Nazis were criminals , have mostly been met with fear and a substantial do...
Read more